H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Sandra Wasserman vs Nancy Feber H2H: 0-1

Nancy Feber holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Wasserman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nancy Feber leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nancy Feber won the 1992 Waregem round of 32 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandra Wasserman
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nancy Feber
BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nancy Feber #361 7-5 6-4 Sandra Wasserman #139 Match data May 7, 1992* R32 Waregem Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandra Wasserman #747 #48 22 1,701 77 93 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nancy Feber #589 #79 219 1,566 25 47 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandra Wasserman Nancy Feber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1992 1–1 50.0% #165 1,502 0 0
17 1987 7–4 63.6% #123 1,596 0 0 1993 3–9 25.0% #152 1,486 0 0
18 1988 19–18 51.4% #63 1,643 0 0 1994 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
19 1989 18–17 51.4% #69 1,632 0 0 1995 9–12 42.9% #101 1,549 0 0
20 1990 12–17 41.4% #103 1,607 0 0 1996 6–12 33.3% #109 1,513 0 0
21 1991 6–10 37.5% #131 1,583 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #177 1,516 0 0
22 1992 3–8 27.3% #135 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1993 8–11 42.1% #112 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1994 4–8 33.3% #198 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandra Wasserman Nancy Feber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1988 8 5 13 61.5% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1989 13 8 21 61.9% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 43 85 49.4% 30 39 69 43.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% — 10 24 34 29.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandra Wasserman Nancy Feber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.25
17 1987 1596 125.6 — — — — — +39 — 64.0% +1.32 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.79 1993 1487 111.8 — — — — +51 — — 26.9% -1.54 1–1 — — -0.06
18 1988 1644 115.1 — — — — -32 +14 -112 51.1% +0.01 8–8 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 100.3 +4.28 1994 1483 105.3 — — — — -15 — +102 36.7% -0.73 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.24
19 1989 1633 118.0 — — — — +44 -43 — 50.6% +0.13 5–6 (45%) 0–5 (0%) 96.1 +3.24 1995 1550 117.2 — — — — -78 — +71 45.8% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +0.43
20 1990 1608 122.9 — — — — +64 -90 — 44.1% -0.71 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 98.4 -0.61 1996 1513 113.7 — — — — -89 — +173 45.5% -0.27 0–8 (0%) 4–0 (100%) 95.3 +1.75
21 1991 1583 107.2 — — — — +19 -21 — 36.1% -1.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 101.4 +0.37 1997 1516 106.1 — — — — -48 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.12
22 1992 1539 107.3 — — — — +30 +11 — 33.3% -1.13 0–2 0–1 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 1556 112.7 — — — — +1 +2 — 42.9% -0.43 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 1540 109.0 — — — — -5 — — 30.8% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1702 120.3 — — — — +26 -5 -112 45.9% -0.30 25–29 (46%) 16–19 (46%) 95.3 +5.13 — 1567 115.2 — — — — -40 — +114 40.7% -0.55 4–16 (20%) 7–4 (64%) 94.3 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.