H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sandra Wasserman vs Patty Fendick H2H: 0-4
Patty Fendick holds a 4–0 lead over Sandra Wasserman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patty Fendick leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1994 Singapore third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 56
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1994* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-0 6-3 | Sandra Wasserman | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1993* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Patty Fendick | 6-1 6-3 | Sandra Wasserman | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1988* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-3 6-1 | Sandra Wasserman | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1988* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 7-6(3) 6-0 | Sandra Wasserman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Wasserman | #747 | #48 | 22 | 1,702 | 77 | 93 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Wasserman | Patty Fendick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1987 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #123 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #103 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #135 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #112 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |