H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sandra Wasserman vs Petra Langrova H2H: 1-1
Sandra Wasserman and Petra Langrova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petra Langrova leads 1–0 on clay, while Sandra Wasserman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Wasserman won the 1990 Australian Open first round 7-6(5) 0-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 56
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 56
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1990* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sandra Wasserman | 7-6(5) 0-6 6-3 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1988* | Paris | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Petra Langrova | 7-6 6-2 | Sandra Wasserman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Wasserman | #747 | #48 | 22 | 1,702 | 77 | 93 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Wasserman | Petra Langrova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1987 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #123 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #103 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #135 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #112 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |