H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sandra Wasserman vs Silke Frankl H2H: 1-1
Sandra Wasserman and Silke Frankl are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silke Frankl leads 1–0 on clay, while Sandra Wasserman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silke Frankl won the 1992 Taranto third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 56
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 56
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1992* | Taranto | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Silke Frankl | 6-2 6-1 | Sandra Wasserman | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1990* | Wellington | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sandra Wasserman | 7-5 6-1 | Silke Frankl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Wasserman | #747 | #48 | 22 | 1,702 | 77 | 93 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Silke Frankl | #940 | #67 | 40 | 1,649 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Wasserman | Silke Frankl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1987 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #123 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #122 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #103 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #160 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #119 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #135 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #117 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #112 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |