H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sandra Wasserman vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 0-1
Tami Whitlinger Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Wasserman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1991 Key Biscayne first round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 56
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1991* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Tami Whitlinger Jones | 6-3 6-0 | Sandra Wasserman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Wasserman | #747 | #48 | 22 | 1,702 | 77 | 93 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | — | — | — | 1,786 | 106 | 135 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Wasserman | Tami Whitlinger Jones | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1987 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #123 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #103 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #135 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #112 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |