H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sandrine Testud vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 0-3
Amanda Coetzer holds a 3–0 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1999 Stanford quarterfinal 2-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1999* | Stanford | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1993* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Amanda Coetzer | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1993* | Melbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-1 7-5 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandrine Testud | Amanda Coetzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 |