H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Sandrine Testud vs Anke Huber H2H: 2-4

Anke Huber holds a 4–2 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2000 Paris round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anke Huber #19 6-1 6-2 Sandrine Testud #9 Match data Feb 10, 2000* R32 Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Sandrine Testud #15 6-3 6-3 Anke Huber #29 Match data Feb 19, 1999* R16 Hanover Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Sandrine Testud #18 6-2 4-6 6-2 Anke Huber #20 Match data Oct 9, 1998* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anke Huber #8 6-3 6-4 Sandrine Testud #19 Match data Aug 15, 1997* R16 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anke Huber #10 6-1 6-1 Sandrine Testud #92 Match data Mar 20, 1995* R32 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anke Huber #10 7-6(2) 6-3 Sandrine Testud #106 Match data May 25, 1994* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,003 309 237 56.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandrine Testud Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2
18 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3
19 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,549 0 0 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6
20 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,568 0 0 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7
21 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,561 0 0 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10
22 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10
23 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10
24 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,774 0 0 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10
25 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,920 0 1 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12
26 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,945 0 2 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12
27 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,917 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,977 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,846 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 1–8 11.1% #313 1,725 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandrine Testud Anke Huber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7%
18 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
19 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
20 1992 7 9 16 43.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0%
21 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6%
22 1994 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3%
24 1996 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0%
25 1997 20 10 30 66.7% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 1999 20 12 32 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 39 17 56 69.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 183 118 301 60.8% 78 66 144 54.2% 19 21 40 47.5% 29 32 61 47.5% — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandrine Testud Anke Huber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.97
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.03
18 1990 1484 99.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.16 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) — -1.91
19 1991 1550 115.1 — — — — +5 -2 — 47.6% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.80 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.55
20 1992 1568 120.4 — — — — +2 -13 -14 42.2% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.18 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.78
21 1993 1561 126.2 — — — — +20 -9 — 39.7% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.09 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) — +2.81
22 1994 1605 130.9 — — — — +19 -44 — 45.3% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.24 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.85
23 1995 1737 138.2 — — — — +1 -140 — 55.1% +0.24 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.86 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86
24 1996 1774 140.4 — — — — -7 -110 -241 54.7% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.01 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.51
25 1997 1921 159.0 — — — — -23 -105 -290 60.1% +0.67 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.03 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.44
26 1998 1945 158.8 — — — — -9 -36 -184 63.6% +1.08 19–10 (66%) 10–10 (50%) — +1.78 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.22
27 1999 1901 157.5 — — — — +27 -33 -217 56.7% +0.48 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) — +2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1918 163.3 — — — — +69 -103 -240 56.6% +0.65 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) — -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1978 158.2 — — — — +16 -130 -244 62.3% +0.97 14–9 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — -3.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1846 144.7 — — — — +107 +12 -165 52.0% +0.39 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1726 120.4 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +166 +41 — 26.3% -1.58 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2004 155.8 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +17 -60 -202 55.2% +0.45 98–79 (55%) 64–61 (51%) 103.8 -0.18 — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.