H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sandrine Testud vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 3-1
Sandrine Testud holds a 3–1 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Asa Carlsson won the 2000 Roland Garros third round 4-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Asa Carlsson | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1998* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sandrine Testud | 6-1 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1997* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sandrine Testud | 6-1 6-4 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Jul 31, 1997* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sandrine Testud | 6-1 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sandrine Testud | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |