H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sandrine Testud vs Dominique Monami H2H: 5-0

Sandrine Testud holds a 5–0 lead over Dominique Monami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2000 Los Angeles round of 16 6-2 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main-draw meetings
Dominique Monami
BEL Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandrine Testud #11 6-2 3-6 7-5 Dominique Monami #16 Match data Aug 11, 2000* R16 Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Sandrine Testud #11 3-6 6-3 6-2 Dominique Monami #20 Match data Mar 2, 2000* R32 Scottsdale WTA 500 Hard
Sandrine Testud #15 6-4 6-4 Dominique Monami #13 Match data Nov 12, 1999* R16 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Sandrine Testud #18 6-2 6-0 Dominique Monami #12 Match data Oct 10, 1998* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Sandrine Testud #50 6-1 6-4 Dominique Monami #71 Match data Aug 31, 1995* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,003 309 237 56.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Dominique Monami #24 #9 2,196 1,974 208 158 56.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandrine Testud Dominique Monami
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0 1991 4–5 44.4% #129 1,528 0 0
19 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,549 0 0 1992 9–14 39.1% #99 1,550 0 0
20 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,568 0 0 1993 15–14 51.7% #59 1,672 0 0
21 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,561 0 0 1994 7–16 30.4% #134 1,601 0 0
22 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0 1995 12–9 57.1% #43 1,680 0 0
23 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0 1996 14–14 50.0% #48 1,698 0 1
24 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,774 0 0 1997 39–17 69.6% #18 1,875 0 3
25 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,920 0 1 1998 45–24 65.2% #12 1,918 0 4
26 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,945 0 2 1999 37–25 59.7% #14 1,840 0 4
27 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2 2000 26–20 56.5% #24 1,842 0 4
28 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,917 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,977 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,846 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 1–8 11.1% #313 1,725 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandrine Testud Dominique Monami
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 1992 7 9 16 43.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 5 7 12 41.7% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1994 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
23 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1996 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 21 7 28 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
25 1997 20 10 30 66.7% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1998 21 10 31 67.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 12 6 18 66.7%
26 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 17 11 28 60.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1%
27 1999 20 12 32 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 2000 16 13 29 55.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2000 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 39 17 56 69.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 183 118 301 60.8% 78 66 144 54.2% 19 21 40 47.5% 29 32 61 47.5% — 100 74 174 57.5% 36 35 71 50.7% 25 18 43 58.1% 47 31 78 60.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandrine Testud Dominique Monami
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1990 1484 99.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.16 1991 1529 107.3 — — — — +48 — — 50.0% -0.19 — — — +0.79
19 1991 1550 115.1 — — — — +5 -2 — 47.6% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.2 +0.80 1992 1551 121.2 — — — — +78 -68 — 39.6% -0.74 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +1.30
20 1992 1568 120.4 — — — — +2 -13 -14 42.2% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 +0.18 1993 1673 124.4 — — — — +19 -121 — 51.6% -0.16 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.4 +0.78
21 1993 1561 126.2 — — — — +20 -9 — 39.7% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 -1.09 1994 1601 118.4 — — — — +38 -104 -2 34.0% -1.21 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) 101.2 -0.21
22 1994 1605 130.9 — — — — +19 -44 — 45.3% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +0.24 1995 1681 130.2 — — — — +6 — — 59.5% +0.60 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.06
23 1995 1737 138.2 — — — — +1 -140 — 55.1% +0.24 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 -0.86 1996 1699 137.0 — — — — -80 -64 -8 52.5% +0.41 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 +0.12
24 1996 1774 140.4 — — — — -7 -110 -241 54.7% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +1.01 1997 1876 147.0 — — — — -17 -173 -163 66.9% +1.26 8–7 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.5 +2.75
25 1997 1921 159.0 — — — — -23 -105 -290 60.1% +0.67 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) 108.5 -0.03 1998 1918 156.3 — — — — +11 -179 -122 62.9% +0.87 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +1.39
26 1998 1945 158.8 — — — — -9 -36 -184 63.6% +1.08 19–10 (66%) 10–10 (50%) 106.1 +1.78 1999 1840 149.4 — — — — +15 -122 -45 58.8% +0.77 8–5 (62%) 4–6 (40%) 100.4 +2.82
27 1999 1901 157.5 — — — — +27 -33 -217 56.7% +0.48 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 +2.23 2000 1842 150.9 — — — — +7 -105 +50 58.8% +0.69 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 102.9 -2.21
28 2000 1918 163.3 — — — — +69 -103 -240 56.6% +0.65 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1978 158.2 — — — — +16 -130 -244 62.3% +0.97 14–9 (61%) 10–13 (43%) 100.0 -3.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1846 144.7 — — — — +107 +12 -165 52.0% +0.39 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1726 120.4 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +166 +41 — 26.3% -1.58 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2004 155.8 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +17 -60 -202 55.2% +0.45 98–79 (55%) 64–61 (51%) 103.8 -0.18 — 1974 148.4 — — — — +10 -125 -56 56.7% +0.49 46–41 (53%) 34–30 (53%) 105.7 +2.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.