H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sandrine Testud vs Emanuela Zardo H2H: 0-1
Emanuela Zardo holds a 1–0 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emanuela Zardo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emanuela Zardo won the 1992 Paris third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 56
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1992* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Emanuela Zardo | 6-3 6-2 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Emanuela Zardo | #976 | #27 | 80 | 1,765 | 69 | 74 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandrine Testud | Emanuela Zardo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #89 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |