H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sandrine Testud vs Erika De Lone H2H: 1-0
Sandrine Testud holds a 1–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandrine Testud leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 1995 Roland Garros first round 7-5 3-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Sandrine Testud | 7-5 3-6 8-6 | Erika De Lone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Erika De Lone | #425 | #65 | 501 | 1,603 | 42 | 100 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandrine Testud | Erika De Lone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #200 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #67 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |