H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sandrine Testud vs Fang Li H2H: 1-1
Sandrine Testud and Fang Li are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fang Li leads 1–0 on clay, while Sandrine Testud leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1998 Budapest quarterfinal 5-7 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 1998* | Budapest | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Fang Li | 5-7 7-6 6-4 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1993* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sandrine Testud | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sandrine Testud | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |