H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sandrine Testud vs Florencia Labat H2H: 1-2

Florencia Labat holds a 2–1 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Florencia Labat leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 1997 Indian Wells Open round of 16 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandrine Testud #33 6-2 6-2 Florencia Labat #52 Match data Mar 15, 1997* R16 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Florencia Labat #69 6-0 6-4 Sandrine Testud #43 Match data Aug 9, 1995* R64 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Florencia Labat #47 2-6 6-1 7-6 Sandrine Testud #101 Match data Mar 4, 1995* QF San Juan Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,003 309 237 56.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,867 191 184 50.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandrine Testud Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
18 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,549 0 0 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,568 0 0 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,561 0 0 1992 18–17 51.4% #52 1,729 0 0
22 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,762 0 0
23 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,787 0 0
24 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,774 0 0 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,780 0 0
25 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,920 0 1 1996 25–18 58.1% #42 1,771 0 0
26 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,945 0 2 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,917 0 2 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,977 0 3 2000 8–10 44.4% #106 1,609 0 0
30 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,846 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 1–8 11.1% #313 1,725 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandrine Testud Florencia Labat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1992 7 9 16 43.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — —
21 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1994 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 24 12 36 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1996 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 11 8 19 57.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1997 20 10 30 66.7% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1999 20 12 32 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2000 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2001 39 17 56 69.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2002 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 183 118 301 60.8% 78 66 144 54.2% 19 21 40 47.5% 29 32 61 47.5% — 106 84 190 55.8% 66 73 139 47.5% 12 12 24 50.0% 7 15 22 31.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandrine Testud Florencia Labat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1483 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18
18 1990 1484 99.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.16 1989 1546 110.9 — — — — +37 +1 — 47.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.8 +1.52
19 1991 1550 115.1 — — — — +5 -2 — 47.6% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.2 +0.80 1990 1573 118.7 — — — — +20 -15 — 42.5% -0.55 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) 104.5 +1.08
20 1992 1568 120.4 — — — — +2 -13 -14 42.2% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 +0.18 1991 1671 134.2 — — — — -10 -1 — 48.8% -0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 106.9 -0.64
21 1993 1561 126.2 — — — — +20 -9 — 39.7% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 -1.09 1992 1730 132.2 — — — — +20 -68 — 50.6% +0.11 6–7 (46%) 0–1 — +0.14
22 1994 1605 130.9 — — — — +19 -44 — 45.3% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +0.24 1993 1762 141.4 — — — — -20 +7 -160 56.0% +0.68 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.9 -1.64
23 1995 1737 138.2 — — — — +1 -140 — 55.1% +0.24 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 -0.86 1994 1788 139.9 — — — — -25 — -123 58.3% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 -0.06
24 1996 1774 140.4 — — — — -7 -110 -241 54.7% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +1.01 1995 1781 133.7 — — — — -26 +8 — 50.8% +0.17 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.32
25 1997 1921 159.0 — — — — -23 -105 -290 60.1% +0.67 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) 108.5 -0.03 1996 1772 142.8 — — — — +32 -66 -49 57.0% +0.70 9–7 (56%) 4–4 (50%) 98.7 +0.20
26 1998 1945 158.8 — — — — -9 -36 -184 63.6% +1.08 19–10 (66%) 10–10 (50%) 106.1 +1.78 1997 1675 134.1 — — — — +5 +54 +73 48.1% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 +1.02
27 1999 1901 157.5 — — — — +27 -33 -217 56.7% +0.48 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 +2.23 1998 1656 126.6 — — — — +51 -6 +31 40.8% -0.83 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.12
28 2000 1918 163.3 — — — — +69 -103 -240 56.6% +0.65 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 -2.28 1999 1620 118.4 — — — — +82 -10 — 35.0% -1.25 1–1 — — -0.60
29 2001 1978 158.2 — — — — +16 -130 -244 62.3% +0.97 14–9 (61%) 10–13 (43%) 100.0 -3.00 2000 1609 110.7 — — — — +27 +28 — 45.2% -0.74 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.45
30 2002 1846 144.7 — — — — +107 +12 -165 52.0% +0.39 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1726 120.4 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +166 +41 — 26.3% -1.58 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2004 155.8 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +17 -60 -202 55.2% +0.45 98–79 (55%) 64–61 (51%) 103.8 -0.18 — 1868 138.5 — — — — +9 -5 -37 49.9% -0.02 67–55 (55%) 38–29 (57%) 106.9 +0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.