H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sandrine Testud vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 0-2

Judith Wiesner holds a 2–0 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Judith Wiesner leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1996 Rosmalen round of 32 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Judith Wiesner
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Judith Wiesner #24 6-3 6-1 Sandrine Testud #35 Match data Jun 20, 1996* R32 Rosmalen Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Judith Wiesner #24 6-4 3-6 6-0 Sandrine Testud #65 Match data Jun 30, 1995* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,003 309 237 56.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,976 303 179 62.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandrine Testud Judith Wiesner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,549 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,568 0 0 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0
21 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,561 0 0 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,695 0 0
22 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,753 0 1
23 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,735 0 2
24 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,774 0 0 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2
25 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,920 0 1 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2
26 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,945 0 2 1992 29–18 61.7% #25 1,911 0 3
27 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,905 0 3
28 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,917 0 2 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,894 0 4
29 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,977 0 3 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,915 0 5
30 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,846 0 3 1996 36–23 61.0% #15 1,922 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,826 0 5
32 2004 1–8 11.1% #313 1,725 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandrine Testud Judith Wiesner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1992 7 9 16 43.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1994 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 6 4 10 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1996 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 21 7 28 75.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1997 20 10 30 66.7% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1999 20 12 32 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 2000 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
29 2001 39 17 56 69.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 11 6 17 64.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 2002 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 5 10 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
32 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 183 118 301 60.8% 78 66 144 54.2% 19 21 40 47.5% 29 32 61 47.5% — 106 64 170 62.4% 131 72 203 64.5% 25 13 38 65.8% 41 30 71 57.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandrine Testud Judith Wiesner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1990 1484 99.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 1550 115.1 — — — — +5 -2 — 47.6% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.2 +0.80 1985 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.09
20 1992 1568 120.4 — — — — +2 -13 -14 42.2% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 +0.18 1986 1514 117.4 — — — — — +64 — 53.3% +0.60 1–2 (33%) — — +0.77
21 1993 1561 126.2 — — — — +20 -9 — 39.7% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 -1.09 1987 1696 127.6 — — — — -111 +11 -79 57.1% +0.56 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.5 +2.26
22 1994 1605 130.9 — — — — +19 -44 — 45.3% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +0.24 1988 1754 146.4 — — — — -139 +74 — 53.7% +0.41 10–7 (59%) 4–1 (80%) 106.3 -0.01
23 1995 1737 138.2 — — — — +1 -140 — 55.1% +0.24 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 -0.86 1989 1736 132.1 — — — — -75 +91 -114 61.0% +0.74 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 100.4 +3.28
24 1996 1774 140.4 — — — — -7 -110 -241 54.7% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +1.01 1990 1846 152.4 — — — — -25 +17 -141 64.7% +1.10 9–6 (60%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.74
25 1997 1921 159.0 — — — — -23 -105 -290 60.1% +0.67 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) 108.5 -0.03 1991 1963 155.9 — — — — -24 -50 -187 61.1% +0.73 9–1 (90%) 3–4 (43%) 108.4 -2.10
26 1998 1945 158.8 — — — — -9 -36 -184 63.6% +1.08 19–10 (66%) 10–10 (50%) 106.1 +1.78 1992 1912 147.1 — — — — -3 +17 -128 57.7% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.07
27 1999 1901 157.5 — — — — +27 -33 -217 56.7% +0.48 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 +2.23 1993 1906 147.9 — — — — -21 +50 — 60.4% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.1 -1.43
28 2000 1918 163.3 — — — — +69 -103 -240 56.6% +0.65 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 -2.28 1994 1894 149.7 — — — — -18 +42 — 63.5% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 +0.38
29 2001 1978 158.2 — — — — +16 -130 -244 62.3% +0.97 14–9 (61%) 10–13 (43%) 100.0 -3.00 1995 1915 149.4 — — — — +25 -25 -156 61.8% +1.24 11–7 (61%) 2–9 (18%) 92.9 -1.06
30 2002 1846 144.7 — — — — +107 +12 -165 52.0% +0.39 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +1.55 1996 1923 154.0 — — — — +7 -98 -7 59.8% +0.61 7–7 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -2.40
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1826 137.1 — — — — +35 -4 +98 61.8% +0.87 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 95.1 +0.60
32 2004 1726 120.4 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +166 +41 — 26.3% -1.58 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2004 155.8 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +17 -60 -202 55.2% +0.45 98–79 (55%) 64–61 (51%) 103.8 -0.18 — 1976 153.6 — — — — -20 +18 -79 60.2% +0.76 84–63 (57%) 50–36 (58%) 106.1 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.