H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Sandrine Testud vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-2

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 2–0 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 Manhattan Beach fourth round 1-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 1996* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 1-6 6-3 7-5 Sandrine Testud #45 Match data
Apr 8, 1993* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 7-6 6-7 7-5 Sandrine Testud #101 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,019 309 236 56.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandrine Testud Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,546 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,566 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,560 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,771 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,938 0 1 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,946 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,916 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,976 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,845 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 1–7 12.5% #313 1,739 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8