H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sandrine Testud vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 1-1
Sandrine Testud and Kristie Boogert are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kristie Boogert leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sandrine Testud leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2000 US Open third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2000 | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Sandrine Testud | 6-0 6-1 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1997* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Kristie Boogert | 0-6 6-1 7-6 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandrine Testud | Kristie Boogert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |