H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Sandrine Testud vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 1-5

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 5–1 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1998 New Haven fourth round 6-3 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 1998* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #61 6-3 4-6 6-4 Sandrine Testud #17 Match data
May 16, 1997* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #14 6-2 6-2 Sandrine Testud #25 Match data
Jun 28, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #8 6-4 6-4 Sandrine Testud #35 Match data
May 26, 1995* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Sandrine Testud #85 7-6 6-4 Mary Joe Fernandez #13 Match data
May 20, 1994* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #10 6-3 7-6 Sandrine Testud #82 Match data
Jun 18, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #7 7-6 6-4 Sandrine Testud #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,019 309 236 56.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandrine Testud Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,546 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,566 0 0 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,560 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,771 0 0 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,938 0 1 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,946 0 2 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,916 0 2 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,976 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,845 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 1–7 12.5% #313 1,739 0 3 — — — — — — —