H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sandrine Testud vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 6-0

Sandrine Testud holds a 6–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2001 Dubai Tennis Championships round of 16 6-3 6-4.

FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 0
6 main-draw meetings
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandrine Testud #18 6-3 6-4 Miriam Oremans #81 Match data Feb 23, 2001* R16 Dubai Tennis Championships Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Sandrine Testud #18 7-5 6-1 Miriam Oremans #72 Match data Feb 15, 2001* R32 Qatar Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Sandrine Testud #25 6-3 3-6 7-6 Miriam Oremans #48 Match data May 7, 1997* R64 Italian Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Sandrine Testud #78 6-4 7-6(3) Miriam Oremans #41 Match data Jan 20, 1995* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Sandrine Testud #82 6-1 6-2 Miriam Oremans #50 Match data May 19, 1994* R32 Strasbourg Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Sandrine Testud #86 6-4 6-4 Miriam Oremans #154 Match data Apr 16, 1992* R32 Pattaya Tier V modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,003 309 237 56.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandrine Testud Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0
19 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,549 0 0 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0
20 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,568 0 0 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0
21 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,561 0 0 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0
23 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,774 0 0 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0
25 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,920 0 1 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0
26 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,945 0 2 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0
27 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0
28 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,917 0 2 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0
29 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,977 0 3 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0
30 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,846 0 3
32 2004 1–8 11.1% #313 1,725 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandrine Testud Miriam Oremans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1992 7 9 16 43.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1994 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1996 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1997 20 10 30 66.7% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1999 20 12 32 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2000 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7%
29 2001 39 17 56 69.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2002 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 183 118 301 60.8% 78 66 144 54.2% 19 21 40 47.5% 29 32 61 47.5% 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandrine Testud Miriam Oremans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1520 110.3 40.0% -0.60 1–0 -0.11
18 1990 1484 99.3 20.0% -2.40 0–1 -0.16 1991 1472 101.8 +51 +51 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) +0.66
19 1991 1550 115.1 +5 -2 47.6% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.2 +0.80 1992 1532 111.4 +48 -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 +0.45
20 1992 1568 120.4 +2 -13 -14 42.2% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 +0.18 1993 1747 146.5 -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65
21 1993 1561 126.2 +20 -9 39.7% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 -1.09 1994 1733 131.3 -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41
22 1994 1605 130.9 +19 -44 45.3% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +0.24 1995 1769 143.9 -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91
23 1995 1737 138.2 +1 -140 55.1% +0.24 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 -0.86 1996 1714 134.9 -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41
24 1996 1774 140.4 -7 -110 -241 54.7% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +1.01 1997 1774 137.0 -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65
25 1997 1921 159.0 -23 -105 -290 60.1% +0.67 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) 108.5 -0.03 1998 1728 120.1 -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25
26 1998 1945 158.8 -9 -36 -184 63.6% +1.08 19–10 (66%) 10–10 (50%) 106.1 +1.78 1999 1628 117.1 -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 -1.78
27 1999 1901 157.5 +27 -33 -217 56.7% +0.48 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 +2.23 2000 1711 126.6 -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23
28 2000 1918 163.3 +69 -103 -240 56.6% +0.65 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 -2.28 2001 1690 122.8 -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04
29 2001 1978 158.2 +16 -130 -244 62.3% +0.97 14–9 (61%) 10–13 (43%) 100.0 -3.00 2002 1613 100.3 -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42
30 2002 1846 144.7 +107 +12 -165 52.0% +0.39 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +1.55
32 2004 1726 120.4 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +166 +41 26.3% -1.58 0–3 (0%) 1–1 -1.36
Career 2004 155.8 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +17 -60 -202 55.2% +0.45 98–79 (55%) 64–61 (51%) 103.8 -0.18 1808 135.6 -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.