H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sandrine Testud vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 4-0
Sandrine Testud holds a 4–0 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 1998 Kremlin Cup fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 1998* | Kremlin Cup | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Sandrine Testud | 6-4 6-3 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1998* | Prague | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Sandrine Testud | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| May 13, 1998* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sandrine Testud | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1995* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sandrine Testud | 6-3 6-4 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandrine Testud | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |