H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sandrine Testud vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 0-1

Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 1–0 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1991 Oslo round of 32 6-1 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Raffaella Reggi Concato
ITA Age 60 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Raffaella Reggi Concato 6-1 2-6 6-4 Sandrine Testud #164 Match data Feb 8, 1991* R32 Oslo Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,003 309 237 56.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Raffaella Reggi Concato — — — 1,929 260 178 59.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandrine Testud Raffaella Reggi Concato
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,421 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,413 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 21–20 51.2% — 1,668 0 0
18 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0 1984 17–14 54.8% — 1,753 0 0
19 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,549 0 0 1985 26–19 57.8% — 1,783 0 1
20 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,568 0 0 1986 31–20 60.8% — 1,896 0 3
21 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,561 0 0 1987 39–21 65.0% — 1,903 0 4
22 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0 1988 30–16 65.2% — 1,911 0 4
23 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0 1989 39–22 63.9% — 1,855 0 4
24 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,774 0 0 1990 31–16 66.0% — 1,816 0 5
25 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,920 0 1 1991 11–11 50.0% — 1,707 0 5
26 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,945 0 2 1992 14–12 53.8% — 1,723 0 5
27 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,917 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,977 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,846 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 1–8 11.1% #313 1,725 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandrine Testud Raffaella Reggi Concato
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1992 7 9 16 43.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 11 5 16 68.8% 20 10 30 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1994 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 20 11 31 64.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 1996 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 22 12 34 64.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1997 20 10 30 66.7% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
26 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1999 20 12 32 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 39 17 56 69.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 183 118 301 60.8% 78 66 144 54.2% 19 21 40 47.5% 29 32 61 47.5% — 101 67 168 60.1% 102 57 159 64.2% 23 17 40 57.5% 34 34 68 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandrine Testud Raffaella Reggi Concato
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1421 91.5 — — — — — — — 23.1% -2.39 0–3 (0%) — — +0.25
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1414 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1668 126.0 — — — — +22 -51 -55 47.3% -0.21 9–2 (82%) 3–4 (43%) 109.6 -0.02
18 1990 1484 99.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.16 1984 1753 129.4 — — — — -112 +30 -123 55.2% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.3 -1.00
19 1991 1550 115.1 — — — — +5 -2 — 47.6% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.2 +0.80 1985 1783 138.4 — — — — -146 +128 — 54.2% +0.26 11–6 (65%) 4–5 (44%) 102.7 +0.03
20 1992 1568 120.4 — — — — +2 -13 -14 42.2% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 +0.18 1986 1896 151.8 — — — — -61 +68 -239 57.6% +0.70 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 105.3 -1.91
21 1993 1561 126.2 — — — — +20 -9 — 39.7% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 -1.09 1987 1904 144.7 — — — — -19 +25 -206 62.5% +0.81 9–9 (50%) 5–0 (100%) 99.9 -0.62
22 1994 1605 130.9 — — — — +19 -44 — 45.3% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +0.24 1988 1912 144.0 — — — — +15 -21 -182 61.0% +0.50 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 106.8 -1.20
23 1995 1737 138.2 — — — — +1 -140 — 55.1% +0.24 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 -0.86 1989 1856 141.4 — — — — -4 +23 -73 59.4% +0.69 12–8 (60%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 +0.65
24 1996 1774 140.4 — — — — -7 -110 -241 54.7% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +1.01 1990 1816 142.9 — — — — +36 +78 -27 61.5% +0.89 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) 100.3 +0.44
25 1997 1921 159.0 — — — — -23 -105 -290 60.1% +0.67 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) 108.5 -0.03 1991 1707 117.7 — — — — +35 +164 — 49.0% -0.35 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +1.53
26 1998 1945 158.8 — — — — -9 -36 -184 63.6% +1.08 19–10 (66%) 10–10 (50%) 106.1 +1.78 1992 1723 128.2 — — — — +7 +121 — 52.5% -0.02 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) 103.2 -0.10
27 1999 1901 157.5 — — — — +27 -33 -217 56.7% +0.48 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 +2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1918 163.3 — — — — +69 -103 -240 56.6% +0.65 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1978 158.2 — — — — +16 -130 -244 62.3% +0.97 14–9 (61%) 10–13 (43%) 100.0 -3.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1846 144.7 — — — — +107 +12 -165 52.0% +0.39 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1726 120.4 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +166 +41 — 26.3% -1.58 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2004 155.8 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +17 -60 -202 55.2% +0.45 98–79 (55%) 64–61 (51%) 103.8 -0.18 — 1930 143.8 — — — — -14 +46 -117 56.4% +0.38 82–52 (61%) 47–22 (68%) 113.8 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.