H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sandrine Testud vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 2-3

Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 3–2 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2000 Canadian Open round of 32 3-6 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main-draw meetings
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
ROU Age 53 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandrine Testud #11 3-6 7-5 6-2 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Aug 17, 2000* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie 2-6 6-4 6-4 Sandrine Testud #10 Match data Jun 24, 2000* QF Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie 5-7 6-4 7-5 Sandrine Testud #16 Match data Aug 28, 1999* QF New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Sandrine Testud #17 6-4 6-1 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Aug 27, 1998* R32 New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie 6-3 6-3 Sandrine Testud #14 Match data Apr 1, 1998* R64 Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,003 309 237 56.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie — — — 1,960 186 182 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandrine Testud Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,568 0 0 1993 13–15 46.4% — 1,584 0 0
21 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,561 0 0 1994 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 0
22 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0 1995 17–16 51.5% — 1,663 0 0
23 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0 1996 31–16 66.0% — 1,845 0 3
24 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,774 0 0 1997 37–26 58.7% — 1,778 0 4
25 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,920 0 1 1998 18–25 41.9% — 1,696 0 4
26 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,945 0 2 1999 30–22 57.7% — 1,831 0 4
27 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2 2000 20–25 44.4% — 1,671 0 4
28 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,917 0 2 2001 9–17 34.6% — 1,542 0 4
29 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,977 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,846 0 3 2003 0–2 0.0% — 1,510 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2004 1–3 25.0% — 1,504 0 4
32 2004 1–8 11.1% #313 1,725 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandrine Testud Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 7 9 16 43.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 3 7 10 30.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 2 5 7 28.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1994 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 5 5 10 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 7 6 13 53.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1996 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 20 9 29 69.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 1997 20 10 30 66.7% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
26 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 12 10 22 54.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1999 20 12 32 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 2000 7 12 19 36.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
28 2000 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 2 10 12 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2001 39 17 56 69.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 183 118 301 60.8% 78 66 144 54.2% 19 21 40 47.5% 29 32 61 47.5% — 62 75 137 45.3% 95 64 159 59.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 10 27 37 27.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandrine Testud Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1990 1484 99.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 1550 115.1 — — — — +5 -2 — 47.6% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.2 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 1568 120.4 — — — — +2 -13 -14 42.2% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 +0.18 1993 1584 120.7 — — — — -73 +68 +30 45.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 101.1 +0.86
21 1993 1561 126.2 — — — — +20 -9 — 39.7% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 -1.09 1994 1590 113.2 — — — — -94 +83 — 44.1% -0.53 3–6 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 94.7 +0.90
22 1994 1605 130.9 — — — — +19 -44 — 45.3% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +0.24 1995 1663 135.9 — — — — -137 +102 — 51.9% +0.39 5–6 (45%) 5–1 (83%) 102.1 +0.99
23 1995 1737 138.2 — — — — +1 -140 — 55.1% +0.24 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 -0.86 1996 1846 133.4 — — — — -211 +41 -120 59.3% +0.43 16–5 (76%) 9–2 (82%) 115.9 +0.11
24 1996 1774 140.4 — — — — -7 -110 -241 54.7% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +1.01 1997 1778 145.5 — — — — -116 +159 +33 55.0% +0.30 15–10 (60%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 +0.55
25 1997 1921 159.0 — — — — -23 -105 -290 60.1% +0.67 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) 108.5 -0.03 1998 1696 144.6 — — — — -43 +199 — 46.9% -0.16 4–10 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 96.4 -0.86
26 1998 1945 158.8 — — — — -9 -36 -184 63.6% +1.08 19–10 (66%) 10–10 (50%) 106.1 +1.78 1999 1832 151.2 — — — — -61 +71 -133 55.6% +0.52 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 103.8 -0.42
27 1999 1901 157.5 — — — — +27 -33 -217 56.7% +0.48 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 +2.23 2000 1672 134.5 — — — — -57 +196 +97 48.1% -0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 97.6 -1.14
28 2000 1918 163.3 — — — — +69 -103 -240 56.6% +0.65 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 -2.28 2001 1543 113.9 — — — — +72 +132 +197 37.3% -0.58 3–6 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 91.5 +0.37
29 2001 1978 158.2 — — — — +16 -130 -244 62.3% +0.97 14–9 (61%) 10–13 (43%) 100.0 -3.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1846 144.7 — — — — +107 +12 -165 52.0% +0.39 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +1.55 2003 1511 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1505 112.3 +1.16 +0.66 0.673 41.2% +91 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.20
32 2004 1726 120.4 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +166 +41 — 26.3% -1.58 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2004 155.8 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +17 -60 -202 55.2% +0.45 98–79 (55%) 64–61 (51%) 103.8 -0.18 — 1960 141.7 +1.16 +0.66 0.673 41.2% -80 +118 +9 50.4% +0.05 64–61 (51%) 38–33 (54%) 105.1 +0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.