H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sania Mirza vs Akgul Amanmuradova H2H: 2-0
Sania Mirza holds a 2–0 lead over Akgul Amanmuradova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sania Mirza leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2011 Dubai second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 42
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2011* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-3 6-1 | Akgul Amanmuradova | Match data |
| Sep 17, 2010* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-4 6-3 | Akgul Amanmuradova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Akgul Amanmuradova | #1,097 | #50 | 1,031 | 1,631 | 61 | 101 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Akgul Amanmuradova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #607 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #197 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #114 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #227 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #459 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |