H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sania Mirza vs Alexa Glatch H2H: 2-0
Sania Mirza holds a 2–0 lead over Alexa Glatch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sania Mirza leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2006 Forest Hills fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2006* | Forest Hills | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-2 6-3 | Alexa Glatch | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2005* | Forest Hills | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-4 6-4 | Alexa Glatch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Alexa Glatch | #977 | #102 | 615 | 1,531 | 16 | 46 | 25.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Alexa Glatch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #140 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #297 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #155 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #138 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,377 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |