H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Sania Mirza holds a 2–0 lead over Kristina Barrois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sania Mirza leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2012 Indian Wells Open round of 128 4-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Kristina Barrois | Match data | Mar 9, 2012* | R128 | Indian Wells Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Sania Mirza | 6-3 6-3 | Kristina Barrois | Match data | May 24, 2011* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,829 | 121 | 118 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kristina Barrois | #349 | #57 | 1,066 | 1,701 | 34 | 59 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Kristina Barrois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #101 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #237 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #78 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #79 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #91 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Kristina Barrois | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 25 | 13 | 38 | 65.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 16 | 17 | 33 | 48.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 27 | 14 | 41 | 65.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 99 | 84 | 183 | 54.1% | 7 | 16 | 23 | 30.4% | 14 | 17 | 31 | 45.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | 7 | 28 | 35 | 20.0% | 20 | 21 | 41 | 48.8% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/236 of Sania Mirza's and 82/93 of Kristina Barrois's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Kristina Barrois | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2005 | 11/43 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 52.3% | 64.5% | 43.1% | 56.0% | 39.5% | 54.3% | 45.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 21/44 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 56.7% | 61.1% | 41.3% | 46.9% | 48.2% | 52.8% | 47.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 39/50 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 58.8% | 65.8% | 43.0% | 54.7% | 45.2% | 56.3% | 46.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 18/23 | 2.1 | 4.9 | 55.2% | 63.2% | 47.3% | 46.8% | 58.1% | 56.0% | 42.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 30/30 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 55.3% | 62.2% | 44.1% | 50.7% | 47.9% | 54.1% | 46.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 14/15 | 2.1 | 4.4 | 56.1% | 60.7% | 43.9% | 41.3% | 42.4% | 53.3% | 45.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 23/23 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 56.7% | 59.6% | 38.7% | 49.8% | 52.2% | 50.3% | 46.6% | 2006 | 3/5 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 71.6% | 54.4% | 44.9% | 45.9% | 33.3% | 51.7% | 39.8% |
| 25 | 2012 | 8/8 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 57.3% | 59.3% | 46.3% | 50.6% | 51.5% | 53.6% | 42.9% | 2007 | 1/4 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 67.8% | 49.2% | 53.6% | 40.0% | 50.0% | 50.6% | 41.4% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21/24 | 4.4 | 3.6 | 57.4% | 68.1% | 48.4% | 53.3% | 52.0% | 59.5% | 40.4% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 24/26 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 61.0% | 62.6% | 47.8% | 57.3% | 51.6% | 57.0% | 41.8% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 24/25 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 64.0% | 62.7% | 45.3% | 56.9% | 42.0% | 56.3% | 39.7% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7/7 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 62.8% | 61.3% | 40.2% | 50.0% | 40.6% | 53.3% | 35.4% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 59.2% | 57.5% | 36.0% | 54.4% | 38.6% | 48.7% | 38.1% |
| Career | — | 164/239 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 56.5% | 62.5% | 43.1% | 50.2% | 48.2% | 54.1% | 45.7% | — | 82/93 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 61.5% | 63.4% | 46.3% | 54.8% | 46.9% | 56.7% | 40.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Kristina Barrois | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2003 | 1485 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 1469 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.50 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 1677 | 132.3 | -0.65 | +0.44 | 0.986 | 49.9% | +8 | — | -86 | 59.0% | +0.67 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–2 (80%) | 110.0 | +1.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 1651 | 128.5 | -2.06 | +2.06 | 1.005 | 49.9% | +10 | -157 | -66 | 48.6% | +0.16 | 6–13 (32%) | 3–10 (23%) | 90.1 | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 1756 | 136.9 | +0.06 | +1.75 | 1.062 | 51.2% | +19 | -286 | -178 | 57.5% | +0.63 | 10–5 (67%) | 6–4 (60%) | 104.9 | +0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 1647 | 120.3 | +0.03 | -1.09 | 0.968 | 49.5% | +46 | — | -92 | 52.0% | +0.10 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.5 | +1.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 1719 | 122.5 | -1.13 | +1.12 | 1.002 | 50.0% | +12 | -244 | -77 | 52.9% | +0.09 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–3 (57%) | 104.0 | -0.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 1604 | 110.7 | -1.99 | +0.10 | 0.968 | 49.2% | +28 | — | +17 | 40.5% | -0.51 | 2–5 (29%) | — | — | +0.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 1557 | 117.8 | -3.49 | +1.90 | 0.937 | 48.6% | +17 | -32 | — | 39.6% | -0.96 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.3 | -0.22 | 2006 | 1450 | 107.6 | -0.06 | +1.31 | 0.823 | 45.9% | +32 | — | — | 23.1% | -1.31 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | -0.17 |
| 25 | 2012 | 1541 | 99.8 | -2.53 | -1.83 | 0.925 | 48.3% | +11 | — | — | 36.8% | -0.58 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.42 | 2007 | 1441 | 98.2 | -1.14 | -2.39 | 0.837 | 46.0% | — | +68 | — | 36.4% | -1.18 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.02 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1542 | 118.9 | +2.56 | -1.94 | 0.998 | 49.9% | -53 | +30 | +71 | 45.3% | 0.00 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–6 (33%) | 99.3 | +0.19 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1587 | 118.1 | +0.43 | -1.86 | 0.972 | 49.6% | -115 | +10 | +64 | 45.0% | -0.05 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–3 (50%) | 96.9 | -0.35 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1615 | 119.7 | +1.00 | -2.59 | 0.909 | 48.3% | -136 | +26 | -12 | 47.3% | -0.53 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.7 | -1.49 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1521 | 101.7 | -2.02 | -4.21 | 0.758 | 44.8% | -106 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.31 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | -0.02 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1494 | 98.8 | -1.84 | -0.57 | 0.743 | 43.6% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.04 |
| Career | — | 1829 | 130.7 | -1.28 | +0.98 | 0.995 | 49.9% | +17 | -150 | -87 | 51.1% | +0.13 | 43–47 (48%) | 24–25 (49%) | 98.5 | +1.30 | — | 1701 | 118.5 | +0.84 | -2.15 | 0.926 | 48.5% | -87 | +26 | +49 | 40.8% | -0.52 | 8–21 (28%) | 11–15 (42%) | 90.6 | -1.91 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 3, 2009 | H2H |
| Shahar Peer | 4 | 1 | 5 | Aug 31, 2011 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 25, 2011 | H2H |
| Francesca Schiavone | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 7, 2010 | H2H |
| Alona Bondarenko | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 9, 2009 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 11, 2013 | H2H |
| Michaella Krajicek | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 18, 2012 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 21, 2011 | H2H |
| Sania Mirza | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 9, 2012 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 31, 2011 | H2H |