H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sania Mirza vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 0-1

Lisa Raymond holds a 1–0 lead over Sania Mirza in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 2006 Amelia Island round of 64 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sania Mirza
IND Age 39 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lisa Raymond
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lisa Raymond #75 6-3 6-4 Sania Mirza #39 Match data Apr 5, 2006* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sania Mirza #707 #27 1,148 1,829 121 118 50.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,946 327 273 54.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sania Mirza Lisa Raymond
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0
16 2003 0–1 0.0% #462 1,485 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0
17 2004 0–2 0.0% #169 1,468 0 0 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0
18 2005 27–16 62.8% #34 1,677 0 1 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,618 0 0
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #65 1,650 0 1 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,692 0 0
20 2007 30–20 60.0% #31 1,755 0 1 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0
21 2008 11–12 47.8% #101 1,647 0 1 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,812 0 0
22 2009 17–13 56.7% #57 1,719 0 1 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,860 0 1
23 2010 5–10 33.3% #141 1,604 0 1 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,913 0 1
24 2011 8–15 34.8% #104 1,556 0 1 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,838 0 1
25 2012 3–5 37.5% #278 1,540 0 1 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,794 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,766 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2004 20–19 51.3% #30 1,760 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,635 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,581 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,564 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sania Mirza Lisa Raymond
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 25 13 38 65.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2006 16 17 33 48.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 2008 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1995 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2009 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
23 2010 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1997 18 11 29 62.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2011 4 9 13 30.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 13 9 22 59.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 21 14 35 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 16 11 27 59.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 84 183 54.1% 7 16 23 30.4% 14 17 31 45.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — 175 152 327 53.5% 45 48 93 48.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 54 37 91 59.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sania Mirza Lisa Raymond
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1497 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17
16 2003 1485 97.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08 1990 1480 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23
17 2004 1469 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 — — -0.25 1991 1511 107.5 — — — — +27 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 — — +0.30
18 2005 1677 132.3 -0.65 +0.44 0.986 49.9% +8 — -86 59.0% +0.67 11–5 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 110.0 +1.61 1992 1618 137.7 — — — — +26 — — 51.9% +0.15 1–0 0–2 — +0.38
19 2006 1651 128.5 -2.06 +2.06 1.005 49.9% +10 -157 -66 48.6% +0.16 6–13 (32%) 3–10 (23%) 90.1 -0.39 1993 1692 137.1 — — — — -34 — +15 54.4% +0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 +0.84
20 2007 1756 136.9 +0.06 +1.75 1.062 51.2% +19 -286 -178 57.5% +0.63 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 104.9 +0.75 1994 1749 138.6 — — — — -41 -122 -60 55.2% +0.24 5–10 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 +0.10
21 2008 1647 120.3 +0.03 -1.09 0.968 49.5% +46 — -92 52.0% +0.10 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.5 +1.20 1995 1813 147.9 — — — — -6 — -76 56.0% +0.40 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 107.8 +0.56
22 2009 1719 122.5 -1.13 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +12 -244 -77 52.9% +0.09 6–4 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 104.0 -0.81 1996 1861 149.8 — — — — 0 -246 -26 53.3% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.87
23 2010 1604 110.7 -1.99 +0.10 0.968 49.2% +28 — +17 40.5% -0.51 2–5 (29%) — — +0.71 1997 1913 159.1 — — — — +23 -242 -109 57.9% +0.55 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) 104.2 -0.65
24 2011 1557 117.8 -3.49 +1.90 0.937 48.6% +17 -32 — 39.6% -0.96 2–7 (22%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.22 1998 1839 147.1 — — — — +16 -55 -97 56.9% +0.45 10–10 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 98.2 +0.54
25 2012 1541 99.8 -2.53 -1.83 0.925 48.3% +11 — — 36.8% -0.58 2–1 (67%) — — +0.42 1999 1784 143.4 — — — — +11 -60 -17 49.5% +0.06 9–10 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 98.1 -0.50
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1795 141.6 — — — — -33 -118 +163 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 -0.19
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1834 151.1 — — — — -13 -128 +181 58.1% +0.74 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -2.05
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1755 138.0 — — — — +6 -113 +316 54.5% +0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 +0.97
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1766 139.9 +1.58 +1.47 1.097 52.3% +23 -87 +216 53.8% +0.08 13–7 (65%) 7–4 (64%) 105.7 +0.07
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1760 142.2 +2.54 -0.29 1.089 51.9% +66 -171 +175 48.9% +0.05 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.43
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1635 122.3 -3.26 -0.74 0.782 44.6% +87 -100 +170 43.2% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.1 +2.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1581 121.0 +0.78 -3.50 0.877 47.3% +54 -66 +220 35.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 96.0 -0.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1565 98.6 -2.01 +0.33 0.601 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
Career — 1829 130.7 -1.28 +0.98 0.995 49.9% +17 -150 -87 51.1% +0.13 43–47 (48%) 24–25 (49%) 98.5 +1.30 — 1947 150.2 +0.86 -1.52 0.940 48.9% +12 -115 +91 53.0% +0.26 113–94 (55%) 71–64 (53%) 102.4 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.