H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sania Mirza vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 1-1

Sania Mirza and Lourdes Domínguez Lino are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2008 Hobart International round of 32 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sania Mirza
IND Age 39 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sania Mirza #31 6-4 6-0 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #72 Match data Jan 10, 2008* R32 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #43 6-4 5-7 6-3 Sania Mirza #44 Match data Aug 26, 2006* QF Forest Hills Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sania Mirza #707 #27 1,148 1,829 121 118 50.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sania Mirza Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 0–1 0.0% #462 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2004 0–2 0.0% #169 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 27–16 62.8% #34 1,677 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #65 1,650 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2007 30–20 60.0% #31 1,755 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2008 11–12 47.8% #101 1,647 0 1 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2009 17–13 56.7% #57 1,719 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2010 5–10 33.3% #141 1,604 0 1 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2011 8–15 34.8% #104 1,556 0 1 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2012 3–5 37.5% #278 1,540 0 1 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sania Mirza Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 25 13 38 65.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 16 17 33 48.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2009 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2010 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2011 4 9 13 30.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 84 183 54.1% 7 16 23 30.4% 14 17 31 45.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sania Mirza Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2003 1485 97.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 1469 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 — — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1677 132.3 -0.65 +0.44 0.986 49.9% +8 — -86 59.0% +0.67 11–5 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 110.0 +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1651 128.5 -2.06 +2.06 1.005 49.9% +10 -157 -66 48.6% +0.16 6–13 (32%) 3–10 (23%) 90.1 -0.39 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2007 1756 136.9 +0.06 +1.75 1.062 51.2% +19 -286 -178 57.5% +0.63 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 104.9 +0.75 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2008 1647 120.3 +0.03 -1.09 0.968 49.5% +46 — -92 52.0% +0.10 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.5 +1.20 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2009 1719 122.5 -1.13 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +12 -244 -77 52.9% +0.09 6–4 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 104.0 -0.81 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2010 1604 110.7 -1.99 +0.10 0.968 49.2% +28 — +17 40.5% -0.51 2–5 (29%) — — +0.71 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2011 1557 117.8 -3.49 +1.90 0.937 48.6% +17 -32 — 39.6% -0.96 2–7 (22%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.22 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2012 1541 99.8 -2.53 -1.83 0.925 48.3% +11 — — 36.8% -0.58 2–1 (67%) — — +0.42 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1829 130.7 -1.28 +0.98 0.995 49.9% +17 -150 -87 51.1% +0.13 43–47 (48%) 24–25 (49%) 98.5 +1.30 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.