H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sania Mirza vs María Sánchez Lorenzo H2H: 0-1
María Sánchez Lorenzo holds a 1–0 lead over Sania Mirza in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, María Sánchez Lorenzo won the 2005 Miami first round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 6-2 7-5 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | María Sánchez Lorenzo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |