H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sania Mirza vs Martina Hingis H2H: 2-2
Sania Mirza and Martina Hingis are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2007 Los Angeles third round 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2007* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2006* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 4-6 6-0 6-4 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2006* | Kolkata | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-0 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2006* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 7-5 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |