H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sania Mirza vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 1-2

Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 2–1 lead over Sania Mirza in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2007 Istanbul round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sania Mirza
IND Age 39 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meghann Shaughnessy #66 6-4 6-3 Sania Mirza #52 Match data May 24, 2007* R32 Istanbul Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Meghann Shaughnessy #43 6-4 6-4 Sania Mirza #61 Match data Oct 12, 2006* R32 Bangkok Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Sania Mirza #44 6-3 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #79 Match data Aug 2, 2006* R64 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sania Mirza #707 #27 1,148 1,829 121 118 50.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sania Mirza Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 0–1 0.0% #462 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2004 0–2 0.0% #169 1,468 0 0 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0
18 2005 27–16 62.8% #34 1,677 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #65 1,650 0 1 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 2007 30–20 60.0% #31 1,755 0 1 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0
21 2008 11–12 47.8% #101 1,647 0 1 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1
22 2009 17–13 56.7% #57 1,719 0 1 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2
23 2010 5–10 33.3% #141 1,604 0 1 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2
24 2011 8–15 34.8% #104 1,556 0 1 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3
25 2012 3–5 37.5% #278 1,540 0 1 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sania Mirza Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2005 25 13 38 65.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 16 17 33 48.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2008 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2009 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8%
23 2010 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2011 4 9 13 30.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 84 183 54.1% 7 16 23 30.4% 14 17 31 45.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/236 of Sania Mirza's and 94/240 of Meghann Shaughnessy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sania Mirza Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 11/43 1.9 4.3 52.3% 64.5% 43.1% 56.0% 39.5% 54.3% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 21/44 1.9 3.9 56.7% 61.1% 41.3% 46.9% 48.2% 52.8% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 39/50 2.3 4.0 58.8% 65.8% 43.0% 54.7% 45.2% 56.3% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 18/23 2.1 4.9 55.2% 63.2% 47.3% 46.8% 58.1% 56.0% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 30/30 2.1 4.1 55.3% 62.2% 44.1% 50.7% 47.9% 54.1% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 14/15 2.1 4.4 56.1% 60.7% 43.9% 41.3% 42.4% 53.3% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 23/23 1.3 5.3 56.7% 59.6% 38.7% 49.8% 52.2% 50.3% 46.6% 2003 8/55 5.0 4.4 51.4% 71.2% 47.2% 53.9% 49.8% 59.4% 40.4%
25 2012 8/8 2.5 3.8 57.3% 59.3% 46.3% 50.6% 51.5% 53.6% 42.9% 2004 6/42 6.5 6.7 50.5% 72.4% 42.1% 59.3% 38.6% 57.5% 39.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 11/42 9.1 4.0 54.9% 77.0% 49.1% 57.4% 45.9% 64.4% 39.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 21/47 4.4 5.3 55.4% 68.5% 45.4% 54.3% 38.1% 57.9% 39.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 34/40 4.5 3.9 54.5% 70.0% 45.4% 56.8% 37.8% 58.6% 39.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 5/5 3.0 3.0 54.3% 56.9% 45.0% 58.1% 50.8% 51.2% 37.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 9/9 5.1 2.6 46.3% 64.4% 45.7% 49.6% 31.2% 54.0% 33.6%
Career — 164/239 2.0 4.3 56.5% 62.5% 43.1% 50.2% 48.2% 54.1% 45.7% — 94/466 5.2 4.2 53.4% 69.5% 45.8% 55.6% 39.9% 58.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sania Mirza Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2003 1485 97.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 1469 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 — — -0.25 1996 1512 107.9 — — — — +9 +65 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.72
18 2005 1677 132.3 -0.65 +0.44 0.986 49.9% +8 — -86 59.0% +0.67 11–5 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 110.0 +1.61 1997 1499 96.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.03
19 2006 1651 128.5 -2.06 +2.06 1.005 49.9% +10 -157 -66 48.6% +0.16 6–13 (32%) 3–10 (23%) 90.1 -0.39 1998 1544 115.4 — — — — -48 +81 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.65
20 2007 1756 136.9 +0.06 +1.75 1.062 51.2% +19 -286 -178 57.5% +0.63 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 104.9 +0.75 1999 1439 99.7 — — — — +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 93.7 +2.27
21 2008 1647 120.3 +0.03 -1.09 0.968 49.5% +46 — -92 52.0% +0.10 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.5 +1.20 2000 1652 133.2 — — — — -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 +0.56
22 2009 1719 122.5 -1.13 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +12 -244 -77 52.9% +0.09 6–4 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 104.0 -0.81 2001 1832 151.0 — — — — -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) 110.5 +1.29
23 2010 1604 110.7 -1.99 +0.10 0.968 49.2% +28 — +17 40.5% -0.51 2–5 (29%) — — +0.71 2002 1738 139.5 — — — — +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 94.1 +0.83
24 2011 1557 117.8 -3.49 +1.90 0.937 48.6% +17 -32 — 39.6% -0.96 2–7 (22%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.22 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 — 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 +1.17
25 2012 1541 99.8 -2.53 -1.83 0.925 48.3% +11 — — 36.8% -0.58 2–1 (67%) — — +0.42 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +1.24
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 94.8 +0.33
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 — 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 107.6 -1.20
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.26
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% — +131 — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.09
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 — — 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) — — -0.71
Career — 1829 130.7 -1.28 +0.98 0.995 49.9% +17 -150 -87 51.1% +0.13 43–47 (48%) 24–25 (49%) 98.5 +1.30 — 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.