H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sania Mirza vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 0-1

Nicole Pratt holds a 1–0 lead over Sania Mirza in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2004 Hyderabad round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sania Mirza
IND Age 39 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Pratt #59 4-6 6-3 6-2 Sania Mirza #403 Match data Feb 19, 2004* R32 Hyderabad Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sania Mirza #707 #27 1,148 1,829 121 118 50.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sania Mirza Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 0–1 0.0% #462 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2004 0–2 0.0% #169 1,468 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 2005 27–16 62.8% #34 1,677 0 1 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #65 1,650 0 1 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2007 30–20 60.0% #31 1,755 0 1 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2008 11–12 47.8% #101 1,647 0 1 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2009 17–13 56.7% #57 1,719 0 1 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2010 5–10 33.3% #141 1,604 0 1 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0
24 2011 8–15 34.8% #104 1,556 0 1 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2012 3–5 37.5% #278 1,540 0 1 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sania Mirza Nicole Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 25 13 38 65.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2006 16 17 33 48.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2009 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2010 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2011 4 9 13 30.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 84 183 54.1% 7 16 23 30.4% 14 17 31 45.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sania Mirza Nicole Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2003 1485 97.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 1469 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 — — -0.25 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59
18 2005 1677 132.3 -0.65 +0.44 0.986 49.9% +8 — -86 59.0% +0.67 11–5 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 110.0 +1.61 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50
19 2006 1651 128.5 -2.06 +2.06 1.005 49.9% +10 -157 -66 48.6% +0.16 6–13 (32%) 3–10 (23%) 90.1 -0.39 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66
20 2007 1756 136.9 +0.06 +1.75 1.062 51.2% +19 -286 -178 57.5% +0.63 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 104.9 +0.75 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35
21 2008 1647 120.3 +0.03 -1.09 0.968 49.5% +46 — -92 52.0% +0.10 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.5 +1.20 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51
22 2009 1719 122.5 -1.13 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +12 -244 -77 52.9% +0.09 6–4 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 104.0 -0.81 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
23 2010 1604 110.7 -1.99 +0.10 0.968 49.2% +28 — +17 40.5% -0.51 2–5 (29%) — — +0.71 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
24 2011 1557 117.8 -3.49 +1.90 0.937 48.6% +17 -32 — 39.6% -0.96 2–7 (22%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.22 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88
25 2012 1541 99.8 -2.53 -1.83 0.925 48.3% +11 — — 36.8% -0.58 2–1 (67%) — — +0.42 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45
Career — 1829 130.7 -1.28 +0.98 0.995 49.9% +17 -150 -87 51.1% +0.13 43–47 (48%) 24–25 (49%) 98.5 +1.30 — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.