H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sania Mirza vs Petra Mandula H2H: 1-0
Sania Mirza holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Mandula in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sania Mirza leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2005 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-2 6-1 | Petra Mandula | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Petra Mandula | #417 | #30 | 963 | 1,712 | 69 | 79 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Petra Mandula | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #156 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #90 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #283 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |