H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sania Mirza vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 1-0

Sania Mirza holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sania Mirza leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2005 San Diego round of 64 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sania Mirza
IND Age 39 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sania Mirza #59 6-2 6-2 Tathiana Garbin #81 Match data Aug 3, 2005* R64 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sania Mirza #707 #27 1,148 1,829 121 118 50.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sania Mirza Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 0–1 0.0% #462 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2004 0–2 0.0% #169 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 27–16 62.8% #34 1,677 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #65 1,650 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2007 30–20 60.0% #31 1,755 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2008 11–12 47.8% #101 1,647 0 1 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2009 17–13 56.7% #57 1,719 0 1 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0
23 2010 5–10 33.3% #141 1,604 0 1 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1
24 2011 8–15 34.8% #104 1,556 0 1 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1
25 2012 3–5 37.5% #278 1,540 0 1 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sania Mirza Tathiana Garbin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 25 13 38 65.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 16 17 33 48.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2009 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2010 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2011 4 9 13 30.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 84 183 54.1% 7 16 23 30.4% 14 17 31 45.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sania Mirza Tathiana Garbin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2003 1485 97.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 1469 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 — — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1677 132.3 -0.65 +0.44 0.986 49.9% +8 — -86 59.0% +0.67 11–5 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 110.0 +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1651 128.5 -2.06 +2.06 1.005 49.9% +10 -157 -66 48.6% +0.16 6–13 (32%) 3–10 (23%) 90.1 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1756 136.9 +0.06 +1.75 1.062 51.2% +19 -286 -178 57.5% +0.63 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 104.9 +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 1647 120.3 +0.03 -1.09 0.968 49.5% +46 — -92 52.0% +0.10 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.5 +1.20 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11
22 2009 1719 122.5 -1.13 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +12 -244 -77 52.9% +0.09 6–4 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 104.0 -0.81 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10
23 2010 1604 110.7 -1.99 +0.10 0.968 49.2% +28 — +17 40.5% -0.51 2–5 (29%) — — +0.71 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40
24 2011 1557 117.8 -3.49 +1.90 0.937 48.6% +17 -32 — 39.6% -0.96 2–7 (22%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.22 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37
25 2012 1541 99.8 -2.53 -1.83 0.925 48.3% +11 — — 36.8% -0.58 2–1 (67%) — — +0.42 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20
Career — 1829 130.7 -1.28 +0.98 0.995 49.9% +17 -150 -87 51.1% +0.13 43–47 (48%) 24–25 (49%) 98.5 +1.30 — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.