H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sania Mirza vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 1-0
Sania Mirza holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sania Mirza leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2005 San Diego second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2005* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-2 6-2 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Tathiana Garbin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |