H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sara Errani vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 1-1

Sara Errani and Aleksandra Krunic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sara Errani leads 1–0 on clay, while Aleksandra Krunic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2016 Bucharest first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Aleksandra Krunic
Serbia Age 33 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Errani #90 7-5 6-1 Aleksandra Krunic #637 Match data Mar 3, 2024 Q1 Q Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Sara Errani #21 6-3 6-2 Aleksandra Krunic #134 Match data Jul 14, 2016* R32 Bucharest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Aleksandra Krunic #82 6-3 6-7(2) 6-2 Sara Errani #19 Match data Jul 2, 2015* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Aleksandra Krunic #470 #39 1,210 1,771 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Aleksandra Krunic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2011 2–2 50.0% #223 1,504 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2012 2–1 66.7% #165 1,525 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0 2013 0–4 0.0% #151 1,463 0 0
21 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2 2014 5–6 45.5% #87 1,523 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2 2015 12–19 38.7% #108 1,543 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2 2016 4–12 25.0% #144 1,595 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2 2017 20–13 60.6% #54 1,753 0 1
25 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6 2018 20–23 46.5% #55 1,713 0 2
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7 2019 5–14 26.3% #163 1,556 0 2
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8 2021 6–6 50.0% #128 1,643 0 2
29 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9 2022 9–10 47.4% #115 1,635 0 2
30 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9 2024 2–7 22.2% #286 1,603 0 2
32 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9 2025 0–3 0.0% #468 1,565 0 2
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,590 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Errani Aleksandra Krunic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 8 15 23 34.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
26 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2019 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2021 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2022 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — 41 69 110 37.3% 33 39 72 45.8% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 593/692 of Sara Errani's and 187/204 of Aleksandra Krunic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sara Errani Aleksandra Krunic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 2/4 3.0 1.0 64.4% 78.7% 70.1% 50.0% 58.3% 75.8% 52.6%
19 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5% 2012 3/3 2.0 6.3 48.1% 63.1% 40.4% 51.5% 68.5% 51.0% 50.8%
20 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4% 2013 4/4 1.3 4.5 48.9% 59.7% 50.2% 45.6% 42.5% 54.7% 42.6%
21 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7% 2014 9/11 3.2 4.1 56.7% 64.0% 45.1% 44.4% 49.5% 55.7% 39.9%
22 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6% 2015 23/31 2.6 2.6 57.1% 60.9% 48.4% 49.1% 45.7% 54.9% 37.5%
23 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7% 2016 15/16 1.3 2.3 63.0% 58.0% 43.8% 35.6% 38.2% 52.8% 42.1%
24 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1% 2017 32/33 2.2 1.9 63.6% 64.5% 50.3% 51.1% 51.6% 59.5% 48.5%
25 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5% 2018 40/43 1.6 2.2 63.4% 61.4% 49.2% 52.9% 39.9% 56.5% 43.2%
26 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4% 2019 19/19 1.1 2.1 63.0% 56.1% 47.8% 53.8% 36.9% 52.9% 39.4%
27 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7% 2021 12/12 2.0 1.5 57.1% 64.4% 50.9% 42.3% 67.7% 58.8% 44.0%
29 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0% 2022 19/19 1.8 2.7 58.8% 62.4% 50.4% 58.2% 48.6% 57.7% 44.1%
30 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0% 2024 9/9 1.8 2.6 61.6% 55.9% 46.5% 47.2% 47.4% 52.4% 40.9%
32 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9% — 187/207 1.9 2.4 60.8% 61.4% 48.7% 49.8% 46.4% 56.3% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Errani Aleksandra Krunic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1504 105.6 +1.42 +0.02 2.172 63.5% — — — 33.3% +0.33 — — — +0.40
19 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21 2012 1526 101.6 -1.43 +0.94 1.036 51.0% +12 — — 62.5% +1.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.27
20 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20 2013 1463 96.7 -1.74 -1.39 0.941 48.2% +24 — — 27.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.48
21 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64 2014 1524 119.6 -0.18 -0.41 0.902 48.4% +2 — — 46.2% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.31
22 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75 2015 1543 109.3 -2.03 -3.19 0.832 46.3% -35 -23 +122 40.0% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.3 +0.06
23 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24 2016 1595 118.6 -1.15 -1.51 0.893 47.6% -54 +15 +43 27.3% -1.30 0–1 1–1 — -1.00
24 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90 2017 1753 130.9 +2.13 +3.51 1.197 53.9% -68 +21 — 59.2% +0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.88
25 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43 2018 1714 131.0 -0.44 -0.20 0.992 49.5% -69 +26 +49 44.3% -0.43 8–5 (62%) 5–3 (63%) 105.6 -0.57
26 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44 2019 1557 107.2 -2.43 -3.32 0.836 46.4% -17 +146 — 27.5% -1.58 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.16
27 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08 2021 1644 126.9 +1.13 +0.71 1.067 51.3% -4 +67 — 43.5% +0.17 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.04
29 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33 2022 1635 120.3 +0.48 +1.43 1.042 50.8% -31 +63 +22 48.8% -0.05 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.11
30 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62 2023 1633 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13 2024 1604 109.4 -1.80 -1.53 0.858 46.5% -21 — +83 30.4% -1.48 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 -0.04
32 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92 2025 1566 106.9 — — — — — +73 — 25.0% -2.50 0–2 — — -0.70
33 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05 2026 1551 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06 — 1772 124.4 -0.34 -0.21 0.983 49.6% -39 +40 +64 42.5% -0.51 23–30 (43%) 18–19 (49%) 97.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.