H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 3-3

Sara Errani and Anabel Medina Garrigues are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 2–1 on clay, while Sara Errani leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2011 Toronto second round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 2011 Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #33 7-5 6-1 Sara Errani #36 Match data
Jul 9, 2011* Budapest WTA 250 QF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #43 4-6 7-5 3-0 (ret.) Sara Errani #35 Match data
Apr 9, 2010* Marbella WTA 250 R16 Clay Sara Errani #43 6-1 7-6(1) Anabel Medina Garrigues #42 Match data
Apr 11, 2009* Marbella WTA 250 QF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #20 6-2 6-7(4) 7-5 Sara Errani #40 Match data
Jul 27, 2008* Portoroz WTA 250 F Hard Sara Errani #56 6-3 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #32 Match data
Sep 14, 2007* Bali WTA 500 R16 Hard Sara Errani #90 7-5 4-6 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —