H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Barbora Strycova H2H: 5-3

Sara Errani holds a 5–3 lead over Barbora Strycova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Barbora Strycova leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Sara Errani leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2018 Auckland third round 6-4 6-7(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 4, 2018* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Barbora Strycova #23 6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 Sara Errani #132 Match data
Mar 11, 2017* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Barbora Strycova #19 6-4 5-7 6-2 Sara Errani #104 Match data
Sep 27, 2016* Wuhan WTA 1000 R64 Hard Barbora Strycova #21 6-1 3-6 6-1 Sara Errani #35 Match data
Feb 20, 2016* Dubai WTA 1000 F Hard Sara Errani #22 6-0 6-2 Barbora Strycova #47 Match data
Jun 25, 2015* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Sara Errani #19 6-2 6-7(1) 7-6(7) Barbora Strycova #28 Match data
Jul 12, 2013* Palermo WTA 250 R16 Clay Sara Errani #6 6-3 6-2 Barbora Strycova #96 Match data
Jul 15, 2012* Palermo WTA 250 F Clay Sara Errani #9 6-1 6-3 Barbora Strycova #71 Match data
Sep 29, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sara Errani #40 6-3 6-2 Barbora Strycova #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 286 297 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Barbora Strycova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 14–15 48.3% #57 1,562 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,490 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,477 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,456 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,524 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2016 35–23 60.3% #20 1,791 0 1
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,868 0 2
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2018 23–22 51.1% #33 1,765 0 2
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,713 0 2
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,602 0 2
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —