H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Casey Dellacqua H2H: 2-1

Sara Errani holds a 2–1 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Sara Errani leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2012 Roland Garros first round 4-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Sara Errani #24 4-6 6-2 6-2 Casey Dellacqua #108 Match data
Jan 15, 2009* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Sara Errani #38 6-1 6-2 Casey Dellacqua #55 Match data
May 22, 2008* Strasbourg WTA 500 R32 Clay Casey Dellacqua #51 7-5 6-3 Sara Errani #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,761 79 105 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Casey Dellacqua
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,490 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,473 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,475 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,502 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,502 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2008 17–16 51.5% #53 1,618 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,587 0 0
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,555 0 0
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,535 0 0
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,584 0 0
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,484 0 0
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,745 0 0
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,629 0 0
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —