H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC
Sara Errani vs Francesca Schiavone H2H: 3-1
Sara Errani holds a 3–1 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sara Errani leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2016 Bucharest fourth round 1-6 6-2 0-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 46
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2016* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sara Errani | 1-6 6-2 0-0 (ret.) | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Sara Errani | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| May 8, 2014* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Sara Errani | 6-3 6-1 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| May 5, 2011* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Francesca Schiavone | 6-0 2-6 6-3 | Sara Errani | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Errani | #461 | #5 | 5,835 | 2,024 | 384 | 299 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Francesca Schiavone | #486 | #4 | 5,246 | 1,984 | 439 | 367 | 54.5% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Errani | Francesca Schiavone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #80 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #42 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #47 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #41 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #45 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #13 | 1,952 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #7 | 1,894 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #15 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #14 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #20 | 1,752 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #30 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,625 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2017 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #144 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #7 | 1,898 | 1 | 4 |
| 31 | 2018 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,819 | 1 | 4 |
| 32 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #198 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #35 | 1,687 | 1 | 5 |
| 33 | 2020 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,722 | 1 | 6 |
| 34 | 2021 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 9 | 2014 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #78 | 1,619 | 1 | 6 |
| 35 | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,597 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,562 | 1 | 6 |
| 36 | 2023 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #105 | 1,550 | 0 | 9 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,594 | 1 | 7 |
| 37 | 2024 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #91 | 1,619 | 1 | 8 |
| 38 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,594 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,501 | 1 | 8 |