H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 3-2

Sara Errani holds a 3–2 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Sara Errani leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2015 Zhuhai round-robin match 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Jelena Jankovic
SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 2, 2015 Zhuhai WTA 500 RR Hard Jelena Jankovic #21 6-4 7-5 Sara Errani #18 Match data
Jun 3, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Sara Errani #11 7-6(5) 6-2 Jelena Jankovic #7 Match data
May 17, 2014* Rome WTA 1000 SF Clay Sara Errani #11 6-3 7-5 Jelena Jankovic #8 Match data
Oct 21, 2013 WTA Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Sara Errani #7 6-4 6-4 Jelena Jankovic #8 Match data
Mar 11, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Jelena Jankovic #9 2-6 7-6(6) 6-4 Sara Errani #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Jelena Jankovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —