H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 3-2

Sara Errani holds a 3–2 lead over Kaia Kanepi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sara Errani leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2014 Stuttgart fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Kaia Kanepi
EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 25, 2014* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Sara Errani #11 6-3 6-3 Kaia Kanepi #23 Match data
Oct 20, 2011* Moscow WTA 500 R32 Hard Kaia Kanepi #43 6-0 7-5 Sara Errani #46 Match data
Jun 22, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Sara Errani #34 6-1 6-4 Kaia Kanepi #17 Match data
Jul 17, 2010* Palermo WTA 250 QF Clay Kaia Kanepi #38 6-2 6-2 Sara Errani #34 Match data
Mar 2, 2007* Acapulco WTA 500 R16 Clay Sara Errani #216 1-6 6-3 6-4 Kaia Kanepi #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4