H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 5-1

Sara Errani holds a 5–1 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Sara Errani leads 4–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2015 Rio de Janeiro fourth round 6-0 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 2015* Rio de Janeiro WTA 250 R16 Clay Sara Errani #16 6-0 7-5 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #108 Match data
Mar 6, 2013* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sara Errani #8 6-2 3-6 6-3 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #54 Match data
Jun 12, 2008* Barcelona WTA 250 R32 Clay Sara Errani #61 6-3 6-2 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #113 Match data
Feb 22, 2008* Bogota WTA 500 R16 Clay Sara Errani #66 6-0 6-3 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #78 Match data
Jul 21, 2007* Palermo WTA 250 QF Clay Sara Errani #102 6-2 6-0 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #62 Match data
Feb 22, 2007* Bogota WTA 500 R32 Clay Lourdes Domínguez Lino #51 4-6 6-1 6-3 Sara Errani #193 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —