H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sara Errani vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 1-2

Michaella Krajicek holds a 2–1 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michaella Krajicek leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michaella Krajicek won the 2009 Libéma Open first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Michaella Krajicek
The Netherlands Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michaella Krajicek #129 6-4 6-2 Sara Errani #41 Match data Jun 17, 2009* R32 Libéma Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Sara Errani #69 7-5 6-7(4) 6-2 Michaella Krajicek #33 Match data Jan 3, 2008* R32 ASB Classic Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Michaella Krajicek #36 6-4 6-4 Sara Errani #207 Match data Jul 29, 2006* QF Budapest Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Michaella Krajicek #1,134 #30 918 1,802 89 98 47.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Michaella Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #244 1,471 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2005 14–8 63.6% #63 1,653 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2006 26–16 61.9% #35 1,752 0 3
18 — — — — — — — 2007 21–25 45.7% #33 1,670 0 3
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2008 3–13 18.8% #203 1,536 0 3
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0 2009 4–7 36.4% #128 1,536 0 3
21 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2 2010 2–5 28.6% #145 1,506 0 3
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2 2011 9–6 60.0% #93 1,589 0 3
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2 2012 7–9 43.8% #167 1,562 0 3
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2 2013 1–4 20.0% #282 1,536 0 3
25 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6 2014 1–1 50.0% #273 1,545 0 3
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7 2015 1–1 50.0% #178 1,549 0 3
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8 — — — — — — —
29 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,590 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Errani Michaella Krajicek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 5 16 68.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 14 9 23 60.9% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2015 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — 52 53 105 49.5% 18 26 44 40.9% 19 18 37 51.4% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 593/692 of Sara Errani's and 134/184 of Michaella Krajicek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sara Errani Michaella Krajicek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/22 4.4 4.8 58.1% 66.3% 43.8% 49.5% 51.2% 56.2% 43.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 17/42 3.8 4.1 60.9% 62.1% 45.9% 59.5% 48.6% 55.8% 35.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 39/46 4.5 5.1 59.9% 69.1% 44.6% 54.0% 49.3% 59.2% 44.1%
19 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5% 2008 16/16 3.5 4.8 60.6% 61.0% 45.5% 39.9% 46.1% 54.8% 37.2%
20 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4% 2009 11/11 2.6 5.6 59.8% 65.4% 48.9% 58.8% 39.7% 58.8% 37.8%
21 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7% 2010 7/7 4.0 5.4 60.9% 61.2% 36.9% 48.0% 53.7% 51.7% 39.3%
22 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6% 2011 14/15 6.1 4.1 52.7% 76.4% 48.5% 45.5% 36.0% 63.2% 38.2%
23 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7% 2012 16/16 5.6 6.9 52.9% 67.5% 45.5% 45.1% 33.8% 57.1% 38.4%
24 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1% 2013 5/5 6.0 8.2 51.0% 65.0% 40.1% 47.1% 53.3% 53.1% 38.0%
25 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5% 2014 2/2 8.0 2.0 63.2% 74.3% 55.9% 55.0% 52.4% 67.6% 37.9%
26 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4% 2015 2/2 18.5 2.5 67.9% 74.8% 50.7% 65.3% 56.3% 67.0% 23.4%
27 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9% — 134/187 4.7 5.1 58.3% 67.0% 45.4% 50.9% 45.4% 57.9% 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Errani Michaella Krajicek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1490 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1472 98.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1653 123.1 -0.34 -0.48 0.988 50.3% +4 -140 -95 60.0% +0.98 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 +0.45
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1752 128.7 +0.10 -4.98 0.810 46.4% -10 -161 -31 54.0% +0.30 10–1 (91%) 4–6 (40%) 109.2 -1.86
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1671 133.9 +2.45 +0.06 1.081 51.6% -42 -36 +109 46.7% +0.27 7–8 (47%) 3–13 (19%) 92.8 -0.19
19 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21 2008 1536 99.3 -1.35 -4.34 0.823 45.9% +17 -23 +207 27.0% -1.33 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 +0.74
20 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20 2009 1536 114.7 +1.40 -2.80 0.919 48.8% +22 — +168 40.7% -0.74 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.19
21 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64 2010 1507 96.3 -2.93 -3.02 0.815 45.9% +30 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.16
22 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75 2011 1589 120.2 +2.85 -3.04 1.037 50.4% +35 — — 57.1% +0.40 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +1.00
23 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24 2012 1562 112.0 -0.14 -3.52 0.895 47.7% +61 -54 — 44.4% -0.53 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.8 +0.19
24 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90 2013 1536 98.4 -0.64 -2.23 0.809 45.9% — — +55 33.3% -1.33 0–2 0–2 — -0.28
25 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43 2014 1546 103.0 +2.61 -2.09 1.167 52.6% — — — 40.0% +0.80 1–0 0–2 — +0.11
26 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44 2015 1549 102.0 +0.78 -1.05 0.709 47.8% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.05
27 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08 2017 1529 92.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33 2018 1512 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07 2024 1502 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06 — 1803 124.4 +0.82 -2.41 0.938 48.8% +3 -84 +80 47.2% -0.05 35–29 (55%) 24–30 (44%) 100.5 +0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.