H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sara Errani vs Monica Puig H2H: 1-4

Monica Puig holds a 4–1 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Monica Puig leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2020 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main-draw meetings
Monica Puig
PUR Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Errani #150 6-2 6-1 Monica Puig #98 Match data Sep 29, 2020* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Monica Puig #63 6-0 6-1 Sara Errani #209 Match data Apr 3, 2019* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Monica Puig #51 4-6 6-3 6-1 Sara Errani #18 Match data May 18, 2016* R32 Strasbourg Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Monica Puig #51 6-1 6-1 Sara Errani #12 Match data Feb 27, 2015* R16 Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Monica Puig #65 6-3 6-2 Sara Errani #5 Match data Jun 26, 2013* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 0 1 8 9
Monica Puig #1,073 #27 1,570 1,843 139 140 49.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Monica Puig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #211 1,492 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2013 13–15 46.4% #56 1,570 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0 2014 16–18 47.1% #59 1,614 0 1
21 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2 2015 15–23 39.5% #92 1,578 0 1
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2 2016 41–24 63.1% #32 1,770 0 2
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2 2017 20–21 48.8% #58 1,724 0 2
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2 2018 18–14 56.2% #53 1,780 0 2
25 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6 2019 16–19 45.7% #79 1,686 0 2
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7 2020 0–2 0.0% #105 1,623 0 2
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8 2022 0–1 0.0% #1073 1,619 0 2
29 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,590 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Errani Monica Puig
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 5 11 16 31.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
20 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 9 12 21 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
21 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 25 14 39 64.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
23 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2017 17 15 32 53.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2019 7 13 20 35.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — 91 94 185 49.2% 34 30 64 53.1% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 593/692 of Sara Errani's and 252/279 of Monica Puig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sara Errani Monica Puig
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 2.0 7.0 59.8% 64.5% 41.2% 53.8% 50.0% 55.1% 45.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/2 4.0 3.0 50.0% 62.5% 53.1% 75.0% 0.0% 57.8% 30.0%
19 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5% 2013 27/28 2.7 2.7 62.4% 62.4% 51.4% 41.8% 51.2% 58.1% 43.0%
20 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4% 2014 33/34 3.1 4.4 59.8% 66.4% 46.7% 51.1% 46.9% 58.4% 42.7%
21 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7% 2015 32/38 4.4 4.0 60.7% 65.2% 51.0% 50.2% 49.1% 59.4% 38.4%
22 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6% 2016 52/65 3.1 3.6 62.0% 64.8% 49.8% 58.7% 46.5% 59.0% 44.7%
23 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7% 2017 39/41 3.3 3.4 60.1% 65.6% 47.8% 54.0% 45.1% 58.7% 42.8%
24 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1% 2018 31/32 3.0 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 45.7% 52.7% 48.6% 58.6% 42.1%
25 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5% 2019 33/35 3.3 3.6 62.5% 66.1% 48.0% 60.1% 51.9% 59.1% 44.1%
26 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4% 2020 2/2 1.5 6.0 64.6% 55.7% 28.2% 29.8% 28.6% 46.0% 34.8%
27 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7% 2022 1/1 0.0 5.0 60.3% 51.2% 33.3% 53.8% 33.3% 44.1% 32.7%
29 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9% — 252/279 3.2 3.6 61.2% 65.2% 48.4% 53.3% 47.8% 58.6% 42.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Errani Monica Puig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1492 103.5 -1.04 -2.47 1.020 50.6% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1464 94.8 -3.46 -3.96 0.711 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17
19 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21 2013 1571 123.3 +1.46 -0.93 1.027 50.5% -93 +68 +69 50.0% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 +0.09
20 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20 2014 1615 129.5 +1.33 -0.33 1.027 50.6% -75 +119 0 48.7% +0.15 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.29
21 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64 2015 1579 121.9 +0.62 -2.26 0.948 49.1% +9 +55 -13 42.4% -0.19 3–8 (27%) 5–11 (31%) 91.9 -0.38
22 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75 2016 1771 137.9 +2.19 +1.46 1.092 52.0% -9 -57 -89 58.9% +0.70 12–5 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 108.8 -0.14
23 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24 2017 1724 133.3 +2.17 -0.36 1.036 50.7% +15 -63 — 47.4% -0.04 8–9 (47%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 -0.88
24 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90 2018 1780 137.8 +0.96 +0.23 1.017 50.5% +6 — — 56.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.8 -0.76
25 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43 2019 1686 127.3 +1.69 +0.90 1.076 51.5% -34 +39 -64 50.0% +0.35 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 92.6 -0.89
26 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44 2020 1624 94.4 -0.47 -3.91 0.644 40.5% — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — +0.30
27 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08 2022 1619 101.3 +0.44 +1.01 0.584 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14
29 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06 — 1843 134.9 +1.52 -0.09 1.029 50.7% -18 +21 -39 50.3% +0.16 40–50 (44%) 29–34 (46%) 100.5 -1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.