H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 2-0

Sara Errani holds a 2–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sara Errani leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2011 Palermo fourth round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Pauline Parmentier
FRA Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 6, 2017 Madrid WTA 1000 Q1 Q Clay Pauline Parmentier #70 2-6 6-2 6-2 Sara Errani #102 Match data
Jul 15, 2011* Palermo WTA 250 R16 Clay Sara Errani #35 7-5 6-1 Pauline Parmentier #66 Match data
Jan 4, 2008* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Sara Errani #69 6-1 6-2 Pauline Parmentier #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,702 121 188 39.2% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Pauline Parmentier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,507 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2008 17–20 45.9% #61 1,585 0 2
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,536 0 2
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,444 0 2
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,441 0 2
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,465 0 2
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,523 0 2
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,460 0 2
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,580 0 2
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,656 0 2
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,682 0 4
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2019 12–23 34.3% #123 1,598 0 4
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,544 0 4
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —