H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Shuai Peng H2H: 3-3

Sara Errani and Shuai Peng are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Shuai Peng leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Sara Errani leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2014 Charleston fourth round 7-6(6) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 4, 2014* Charleston WTA 500 R16 Clay Sara Errani #11 7-6(6) 7-6(5) Shuai Peng #47 Match data
Aug 18, 2011* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Shuai Peng #15 6-2 6-4 Sara Errani #38 Match data
Aug 5, 2011* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Shuai Peng #17 4-6 6-2 7-6(7) Sara Errani #35 Match data
Jan 15, 2011* Hobart WTA 250 QF Hard Shuai Peng #62 6-1 6-3 Sara Errani #43 Match data
Oct 6, 2010* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sara Errani #40 1-6 6-4 6-1 Shuai Peng #65 Match data
May 14, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Sara Errani #60 6-4 1-6 6-3 Shuai Peng #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —