H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Sara Errani vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1

Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2008 Bali round of 16 6-0 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamira Paszek 6-0 7-6(2) Sara Errani #41 Match data Sep 12, 2008* R16 Bali Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8 — — — — — — —
29 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,589 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Errani Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 593/692 of Sara Errani's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sara Errani Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Errani Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.