H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Sara Errani vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1
Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2008 Bali fourth round 6-0 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 6-0 7-6(2) | Sara Errani | Match data | Sep 12, 2008* | Bali | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Errani | #461 | #5 | 5,835 | 2,005 | 386 | 304 | 55.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Errani | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #42 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2009 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #47 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2010 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #43 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2011 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #45 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2012 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #6 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2013 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #7 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #14 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #20 | 1,751 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,655 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #144 | 1,655 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,768 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #198 | 1,569 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #131 | 1,605 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #121 | 1,574 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,596 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #105 | 1,549 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #105 | 1,693 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,590 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |