H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sara Errani vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-2

Sara Errani and Venus Williams are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2021 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 11, 2021* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Sara Errani #134 6-1 6-0 Venus Williams #81 Match data
Aug 31, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Sara Errani #14 6-0 0-6 7-6(5) Venus Williams #20 Match data
Aug 17, 2012* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Hard Venus Williams #64 6-3 6-0 Sara Errani #10 Match data
Jan 19, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Venus Williams #5 6-3 6-2 Sara Errani #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47