H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sara Errani vs Vera Zvonareva H2H: 0-3
Vera Zvonareva holds a 3–0 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Vera Zvonareva leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2010 Tokyo third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2010* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Vera Zvonareva | 6-3 6-3 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2010* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Vera Zvonareva | 6-2 6-3 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Vera Zvonareva | 6-4 6-1 | Sara Errani | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Errani | #461 | #5 | 5,835 | 2,024 | 384 | 299 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Vera Zvonareva | #307 | #2 | 7,935 | 2,077 | 459 | 268 | 63.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Errani | Vera Zvonareva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #45 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #13 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 54–27 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,935 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2008 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #42 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #24 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2009 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #47 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,935 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2010 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2011 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #45 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2012 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #2 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2013 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #7 | 1,894 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 54–22 | 71.1% | #7 | 1,946 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2014 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #14 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2015 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #20 | 1,752 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,625 | 0 | 9 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,743 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2017 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #144 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #185 | 1,671 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2018 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #198 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #200 | 1,676 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2020 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,702 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | 2021 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #159 | 1,680 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,597 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,731 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | 2023 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #105 | 1,550 | 0 | 9 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,753 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | 2024 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #357 | 1,711 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,594 | 0 | 9 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,683 | 0 | 12 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,646 | 0 | 12 |