H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Ann Henricksson H2H: 1-1
Sara Gomer and Ann Henricksson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ann Henricksson leads 1–0 on grass, while Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Henricksson won the 1986 Birmingham fourth round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1986* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Ann Henricksson | 6-2 7-6 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
| Sep 15, 1983* | Salt Lake City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sara Gomer | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ann Henricksson | #892 | #36 | 21 | 1,756 | 147 | 210 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Ann Henricksson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #49 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #60 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #71 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #141 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #215 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |