H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 2-1
Sara Gomer holds a 2–1 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1992 Roland Garros first round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Sara Gomer | 7-5 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1991* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Sara Gomer | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Feb 8, 1985* | Delray Beach | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 6-1 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sara Gomer | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |