Sara Gomer
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Nathalie Herreman | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 24, 1991 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 30, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Sara Gomer holds a 2–1 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1992 Roland Garros round of 128 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | 7-5 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data | May 27, 1992* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Sara Gomer | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data | Jun 13, 1991* | R32 | Birmingham | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 6-1 | Sara Gomer | Match data | Feb 8, 1985* | R32 | Delray Beach | Series Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 105 | 132 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 261 | 192 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1983 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1983 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1984 | 18 | 4 | 22 | 81.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1986 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1985 | 17 | 5 | 22 | 77.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% |
| 23 | 1987 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1986 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1988 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1987 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 25 | 1989 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 26 | 1990 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1989 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 1991 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 28 | 1992 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| Career | — | 47 | 57 | 104 | 45.2% | 8 | 17 | 25 | 32.0% | 32 | 39 | 71 | 45.1% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | — | 121 | 80 | 201 | 60.2% | 38 | 41 | 79 | 48.1% | 42 | 28 | 70 | 60.0% | 55 | 39 | 94 | 58.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1980 | 1519 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 66.7% | +0.83 | — | — | — | +0.03 | 1979 | 1487 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.03 |
| 17 | 1981 | 1517 | 109.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 45.5% | -0.09 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | 102.6 | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 1545 | 105.7 | — | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | 60.0% | +0.55 | — | 2–0 | — | +1.20 | 1981 | 1488 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.5% | -1.19 | 0–2 | 2–0 | — | +0.21 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1532 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | +81 | — | +22 | 40.0% | -0.92 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.8 | +0.59 | 1982 | 1475 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | +48 | +48 | — | 38.2% | -1.03 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +0.48 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1511 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | 26.7% | -1.60 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +0.16 | 1983 | 1524 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 44.4% | +0.06 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.40 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1568 | 117.6 | — | — | — | — | -18 | — | +24 | 42.9% | -0.46 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.6 | +1.64 | 1984 | 1790 | 134.0 | — | — | — | — | +46 | -198 | -179 | 61.8% | +0.63 | 7–7 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 104.4 | +0.87 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1660 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | -6 | -213 | -39 | 46.9% | -0.28 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.7 | +0.62 | 1985 | 1975 | 162.0 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -345 | -300 | 67.9% | +1.41 | 9–7 (56%) | 2–2 (50%) | 105.1 | -1.46 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1680 | 131.9 | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | -6 | 46.3% | -0.39 | 6–2 (75%) | 5–5 (50%) | 105.2 | -0.33 | 1986 | 1882 | 146.6 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -212 | -145 | 53.9% | +0.50 | 11–8 (58%) | 3–7 (30%) | 100.6 | -0.51 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1747 | 138.3 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | -34 | 53.7% | +0.15 | 6–4 (60%) | 9–4 (69%) | 108.3 | -0.39 | 1987 | 1873 | 150.2 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -182 | +26 | 60.2% | +0.81 | 7–3 (70%) | 8–2 (80%) | 108.4 | +0.96 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1639 | 114.0 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -117 | +78 | 43.5% | -0.78 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–0 | — | -0.51 | 1988 | 1796 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -122 | +73 | 53.3% | +0.22 | 10–10 (50%) | 7–6 (54%) | 97.1 | -0.66 |
| 26 | 1990 | 1636 | 113.1 | — | — | — | — | -36 | — | +106 | 42.4% | -0.48 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.2 | +0.82 | 1989 | 1784 | 144.8 | — | — | — | — | -16 | -119 | +141 | 58.3% | +0.58 | 10–9 (53%) | 9–4 (69%) | 101.1 | -0.14 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1661 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | -33 | — | +111 | 40.4% | -0.55 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–3 (0%) | 97.6 | -1.11 | 1990 | 1726 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -38 | +188 | 55.6% | +0.40 | 4–7 (36%) | 3–1 (75%) | 95.7 | +2.94 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1557 | 104.1 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -82 | — | 34.4% | -1.06 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 94.9 | +1.43 | 1991 | 1715 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -28 | +190 | 53.5% | +0.22 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–3 (57%) | 97.5 | +3.85 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1637 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | +258 | 44.4% | -0.27 | 3–0 (100%) | 4–1 (80%) | 105.9 | +2.19 |
| Career | — | 1779 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -99 | +25 | 45.3% | -0.39 | 32–35 (48%) | 31–30 (51%) | 102.3 | +1.79 | — | 1990 | 146.8 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -131 | -2 | 56.2% | +0.47 | 69–62 (53%) | 48–30 (62%) | 107.5 | +2.01 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Nathalie Herreman | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 24, 1991 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 30, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 14 | 14 | Jul 3, 1991 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 3 | 7 | 10 | Sep 2, 1992 | H2H |
| Catherine Tanvier | 7 | 2 | 9 | Feb 14, 1992 | H2H |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Camille Benjamin | 5 | 2 | 7 | Aug 14, 1991 | H2H |