H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 1-0
Sara Gomer holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1986 Boca Raton first round 6-7 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1986* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Sara Gomer | 6-7 6-3 6-4 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |